Posts

Showing posts with the label grievance

The schools issue

Disclaimer: From the outset, this post is likely to be plagued with my own opinions on the state of the public education system in the UK and the things that plague it. Where I may have done research and found something to corroborate or refute the idea, I will create a link so you can see that for yourself. That said, most of this is a reflection of my own experiences. Why are our schools in such a state? This is the question being asked subtly since the whole furore of increasing provision in schools was mooted in the prime minister's pre-recorded address on 10th May. Overtly, the teacher bashing that has been taking place in the media, on social media and by the government is utterly horrific and incredibly ill-informed. There is a (rather frustrating) misconception amongst a rather vociferous section of the population that since schools closed their gates to all but the children of key workers and vulnerable children, teachers have been spending their time sat on their ...

Is the NHS a charity?

Image
Our government may well try to have us believe this is the case in the not too distant future. An example of an image result from a Google search for "negative NHS headlines". When the NHS became the centre of the British universe due to the effect of ten years of austerity inflicted by the governments and secretary of states in that time, it was reported to be on its knees and on the brink of collapse due to underfunding and understaffing. Anyone who worked within the NHS would openly criticise the way things were being run. There was talk of A&E services being cut down or removed in some areas. There was talk of not enough money to fund the newest medications that had proven to be so successful in trials. Then covid-19 happened. The media forgot about the years of underfunding, the staff retention and recruitment crisis, the alleged plans to privatise the NHS (as was the scaremongering of the election in December 2019). Gone were these negative stories tha...

R.E.S.P.E.C.T.

Image
Find out what it means to me. Today marks the 75th anniversary of VE day. A hugely significant point in British history, nay, in European history. Having a bank holiday is meant to have significance. This is certainly one of those days. However, I find myself asking "did the British public deserve to have their usual May Day bank holiday effectively cancelled in place of a bank holiday to mark VE day?" In short, my answer is "no". Any examples of international comparison here will draw on French customs, because I've experienced it and I also teach about it, so have a bit more awareness than I do of other countries across the globe. I've found this website to be quite useful in refreshing my memory of the history of some events on the annual calendar, particularly the traditional May Day festivities in the UK, and also showing at a glance which other countries also observe each holiday. Having lived in France and experienced the month of bank h...

The glimmers get dimmer...

Will the doom and gloom prevail? This whole period of time where we have been living with coronavirus in our communities has been difficult for the majority of us. More than difficult. It's been unbearable at times. But there are glimmers of hope for the future, however dim they can seem some days. The doom and gloom is being massively exacerbated by the media. They questioned the seeming delay of implementing lockdown. Then wanted to know immediately when and how it would end. They weren't getting the answers from the government (which is nothing new) and so proceeded to speculate and then use their own speculation as the basis for questions to the government. All the while, doing a huge disservice to the general public that they are there to serve in the capacity of being a "voice for the masses". I've commented before on the lacklustre questioning at the daily press briefings, and they get no better. I must say that yesterday's briefing was a littl...

Isn't it ironic?

Image
Don't you think? I had to take a while to process my thoughts on the announcements from Whitehall yesterday. Two of the top five government officials leading the fight against Covid-19 revealed that they have tested positive for the virus, and a third is self-isolating as they are exhibiting symptoms. The irony isn't lost on anybody. For the past month or more, we have been receiving advice from these people on the best ways to limit our chances of contracting the virus ourselves. We have listened to their advice and their instructions to stay home and save lives. We have not been in close contact with family and friends to protect them and us. And so it begs the question (which undoubtedly shall remain unanswered):  WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THEY HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING THEIR OWN ADVICE? It has to be asked. We are all also aware that while they had taken precautions, those they have worked most closely with haven't necessarily done the same. But, let's not forget that...